Blog
Income Tax Penalties and Prosecution in India: What You Risk Under the New Act 2025
Leave out ₹2 lakh by mistake, and the Income Tax Department charges 50% of the tax. Hide it deliberately, and the penalty hits 200%. Miss a TDS deduction, and prosecution brings up to 7 years if unpaid tax exceeds ₹25 lakh. The Income Tax Act 2025 covers all of these in §§ 439–498.
What changed from the old Act
The Income Tax Act 1961 scattered penalty and prosecution rules across more than 20 sections. The 2025 Act reorganises them into two clean chapters:
- Chapter XXI (Penalties): Sections 439 to 472
- Chapter XXII (Prosecution): Sections 473 to 498
Both chapters now sit together, making it easier to find the rule that applies to your situation. The substance of the rules stays the same — the 1961 Act’s repeal from 1 April 2026 does not wipe out liabilities for earlier tax years, which continue under the old Act per the transition clause (§ 536).
Chapter XXI — Penalties
Section 439: Under-reporting and Misreporting
This is the most common penalty you will encounter. The Act draws a sharp line between honest mistakes and deliberate wrongdoing.
| What the department finds | Penalty |
|---|---|
| Under-reported income (unintentional) | 50% of tax on the under-reported amount |
| Under-reported income in consequence of misreporting (deliberate) | 200% of tax on the under-reported amount |
“Misreporting” is defined in the Act itself and covers:
- Claiming deductions you are not entitled to
- Declaring income you know is inaccurate
- Keeping false books of account
- Omitting income deliberately
Worked example: You earn ₹10 lakh but claim a false HRA deduction of ₹80,000, reducing your taxable income from ₹10 lakh to ₹9.2 lakh. Tax saved: roughly ₹14,400 (22% slab). Penalty for misreporting: 200% × ₹14,400 = ₹28,800, in addition to the tax itself.
Key protection: If you file an updated return under § 148 (reassessment notice) and declare additional income, that extra income cannot be the basis for a penalty under § 439. This was introduced by the Finance Act 2026 amendment effective 1 March 2026.
Section 441: Failure to Maintain Books of Account
If you are required to maintain books under § 44AA and you fail to do so, the penalty is a flat ₹25,000 per failure. This applies whether or not the omission was deliberate.
Section 442: Transfer Pricing Documentation Failure
For businesses with international related-party transactions:
- Failure to maintain prescribed transfer pricing documents: 2% of the transaction value, or ₹5 lakh, whichever applies
- Furnishing incorrect information in such documents: same penalty
Other Common Penalties
| Default | Penalty |
|---|---|
| Failure to get accounts audited (§ 445) | ₹1,50,000 (or ₹10,000 for certain categories) |
| Failure to deduct TDS (§ 446) | Tax not deducted and paid — equal to the shortfall |
| Cash receipts violating § 269ST (§ 447) | Amount received as loan, deposit or specified business payment — equal to that amount |
| Repaying loans or deposits in cash in violation of § 269T (§ 448) | Equal to the amount repaid |
| Failure to file SFT (Statement of Financial Transactions) (§ 450) | ₹25,000 to ₹1,00,000 |
| Failure to file TDS/TCS return on time (§ 452) | ₹200 per day of default, capped at the TDS amount |
| Failure to answer questions or produce documents (§ 460) | ₹10,000 per default |
| Non-compliance with PAN/Aadhaar requirements (§ 462) | ₹10,000 per default |
Section 440 — How to Get Penalty Waived
You can apply to the Assessing Officer for a waiver of the § 439 penalty and immunity from prosecution under §§ 478 and 479. The conditions:
- Tax and interest from the assessment order have been paid in full within the period specified in the demand notice
- No appeal has been filed against the assessment or penalty order
The Finance Act 2026 added an alternative path for misreporting cases: you can pay additional income-tax at 100% of the tax on under-reported income (or 120% in certain situations) within the demand-notice period, and the penalty is treated as satisfied. This effectively lets you close the matter by paying a fixed surcharge rather than contesting the penalty.
The application must be filed within one month of receiving the order. The AO has three months to decide. If accepted, no prosecution can be initiated on the covered offences.
Section 472 — Time Limit for Penalty Orders
No penalty order can be raised after the expiry of six months from the end of the financial year in which the assessment or other order was made. This standardised limit replaces the old Act’s confusing multi-modal timelines.
Chapter XXII — Prosecution
Beyond penalties, certain acts constitute criminal offences and can land you in court.
When Prosecution Starts
Prosecution requires sanction from the Principal CCIT, CCIT, Principal CIT, or CIT before a complaint is filed in court. This is a procedural safeguard — the department cannot directly arrest or prosecute without internal approval.
Key Prosecution Sections
| Section | Offence | Imprisonment |
|---|---|---|
| § 476 | Wilful failure to pay TDS to the government’s credit | 3 months to 7 years + fine |
| § 477 | Failure to pay tax collected at source (TCS) | 3 months to 7 years + fine |
| § 478 | Wilful attempt to evade tax, penalty or interest | Tax evaded > ₹25 lakh: 6 months to 7 years. Otherwise: 3 months to 2 years + fine |
| § 479 | Wilful failure to file return of income | Tax evaded > ₹25 lakh: 6 months to 7 years. Otherwise: 3 months to 2 years + fine |
| § 480 | Failure to file return in search cases | Rigorous imprisonment + fine |
| § 481 | Wilful failure to produce accounts and documents | Up to 1 year + fine |
| § 482 | Making a false statement in verification or delivering false accounts | Tax evaded > ₹25 lakh: 6 months to 7 years. Otherwise: 3 months to 2 years + fine |
| § 483 | Falsifying books to enable tax evasion | 3 months to 2 years + fine |
| § 484 | Abetting a false return, account or declaration | Tax involved > ₹25 lakh: 6 months to 7 years. Otherwise: 3 months to 2 years + fine |
The ₹25 lakh threshold is critical: if the tax sought to be evaded or unpaid exceeds ₹25 lakh, you face a minimum of 6 months rigorous imprisonment. Below ₹25 lakh, the minimum drops to 3 months.
Second and Subsequent Offences (§ 485)
If you are convicted a second time, the minimum imprisonment is 6 months regardless of the amount involved.
The “Reasonable Cause” Defence (§ 486)
If you can show that you had a reasonable cause for the default, you cannot be punished. The courts have interpreted this narrowly — “reasonable cause” means something unexpected and outside your control, such as a natural disaster, serious illness, or being misled by a professional advisor. Forgetfulness or ignorance of the law does not qualify.
Who Is Liable in a Company or HUF
- Companies (§ 487): Every person who was in charge of, or responsible to, the company for its affairs is personally liable — the company itself does not go to prison.
- HUFs (§ 488): The karta is personally liable.
Special Courts (§§ 495–498)
All income-tax criminal offences are now triable by Special Courts set up under the new Act. This speeds up prosecution compared to ordinary criminal courts.
Compounding of Offences
You can settle most prosecution offences — before or after a complaint is filed — by applying to the CBDT under its compounding guidelines. Technical or procedural defaults are easier to compound. Evasion-type offences involving large amounts, or repeat offenders, are harder or may be refused.
How Penalties Are Recovered
Penalties are civil debts recoverable as arrears of tax under § 413. The Tax Recovery Officer (TRO) can:
- Attach and sell your movable or immovable property
- Arrest you and detain you in civil prison for up to 6 months
- Attach your bank accounts or salary
Filing an appeal does not automatically stay the penalty. The department can continue recovering the amount while your appeal is pending — unless the appellate authority grants a specific stay order.
The Most Important Numbers to Know
| Situation | Threshold / Amount |
|---|---|
| Misreporting penalty | 200% of tax on the under-reported income |
| Under-reporting penalty | 50% of tax on the under-reported income |
| Books-of-account failure | ₹25,000 flat |
| TDS/TCS failure | Equal to the tax not deducted/collected/paid |
| Prosecution for non-filing or evasion | Tax evaded > ₹25 lakh → minimum 6 months RI |
| Limitation for penalty orders | 6 months from end of FY in which assessment order was made |
| Immunity/waiver application deadline | 1 month from end of month in which order was received |
Common Mistakes to Avoid
1. Filing a nil return when you had tax liability Even if you cannot pay immediately, filing on time stops the prosecution clock under § 479. A late return that shows a tax liability does not attract the wilful-failure prosecution.
2. Ignoring penalty notices Penalty orders come with a demand notice. If you do not file an appeal within 30 days, the penalty becomes final and the TRO can attach your bank account or property without further warning.
3. Mixing penalty and prosecution risk Both proceedings run simultaneously. Winning your appeal against the penalty does not automatically close the criminal prosecution — though a successful § 440 waiver application does grant immunity from § 478 and § 479 prosecution specifically.
4. Thinking a chartered accountant’s advice is a “reasonable cause” defence Relying on professional advice is considered, but courts have ruled that the advice must be based on full and accurate disclosure. If you gave your CA incomplete information, the defence may not hold.
Pro Tips
- Keep every Form 16, investment proof, and bank statement for at least 6 years after filing — the department can raise an assessment for up to 6 years (or longer in search cases).
- If you receive a § 148 reassessment notice, file an updated return promptly — it shields the additional income from § 439 penalties.
- If a penalty has been raised and you qualify, apply for § 440 waiver within the one-month window. Missing this deadline means the penalty stands.
- If you face possible prosecution under § 478 or § 479, engage a tax lawyer immediately. The compounding route is always cheaper than a trial.
- Check your Form 26AS and AIS every year before filing — discrepancies caught early cost less than corrections forced by a department notice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I be penalised and prosecuted for the same offence at the same time? Yes. Penalty (a civil debt) and prosecution (a criminal proceeding) run independently. Clearing a penalty in appeal does not automatically close a criminal case, though it weakens the department’s position in the prosecution.
What is compounding, and can I use it? Compounding means paying a negotiated settlement to close a prosecution case. Most income-tax offences can be compounded under CBDT guidelines — technical defaults easily, evasion-type offences with more difficulty and a higher settlement amount.
How long does the department have to raise a penalty? The department has 6 months from the end of the financial year in which the assessment order was made to raise a penalty order. After that, the window closes.
If I win my appeal against the penalty, do I get a refund? Yes. If the penalty is deleted or reduced in appeal, the excess amount is refunded with interest as per § 244A.
Does the new Act create any new penalty risks compared to the old Act? The substance is the same. The main change is the reorganised structure — §§ 439–498 instead of scattered sections. The misreporting bright-line tests are now written directly into § 439, making the standard somewhat clearer. No entirely new categories of penalty or prosecution were added.
Disclosure: FinWiz24 may earn a commission when you apply through links on this page. This does not influence our editorial independence — every card is scored against the same rubric.
Sources
- Income Tax Act 2025 — objective, scope, and transitional provisions: incometax.gov.in (verified 8 October 2026)
- Penalties and Prosecutions overview: incometaxindia.gov.in (verified 8 October 2026)
- Penalties under the Income-tax Law: incometaxindia.gov.in (verified 8 October 2026)
- Section 440 — Waiver of Penalty and Immunity: itact2025.org (verified 8 October 2026)
- Practitioner guide — Penalty vs Prosecution chart: taxtip.in (verified 8 October 2026)
- Recovery mechanism — Section 413: incometaxindia.gov.in (verified 8 October 2026)
- Section 472 — Limitation for penalty: incometaxindia.gov.in (verified 8 October 2026)
- Section 416 — Other modes of recovery: eztax.in (verified 8 October 2026)
- Commissioner power to reduce or waive penalty: incometaxindia.gov.in (verified 8 October 2026)